Your own behavior may be the biggest obstacle to your financial goals.
Lie #1: I can’t afford to save now, but I’ll definitely get serious in the future. The problem with this justification is that it may take longer to get started than you think, as demonstrated in a recent Prudential TV commercial
featuring Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert. The spot opens with a
shot of a big blue wall that shows the ages 20 to 45 depicted on a
vertical scale in five-year increments. Gilbert asks a group of young
people put a paint mark on the wall at the age they think they should start saving for retirement.
He then asks an older group to mark the age at which they actually
started to save. The idea is to visually portray the retirement savings
“action gap”—the difference between when we know we ought to start
saving and when we eventually get around to it. In this case, based on a
survey of more than 2,500 people done before the shoot, that gap was
six years, with the youngsters saying they should start at age 26 on
average and the oldsters having launched their savings effort at 32.
If you think getting a late start saving for retirement
of just six years is no biggie, think again. A 26-year-old who makes
$40,000 a year, gets 2% annual raises, saves 15% of yearly pay and earns
6% annually on his savings would accumulate a nest egg of just under
$1.2 million by age 65. If that person waits six years until age 32 to
get started, his nest egg would total roughly $855,000. That’s $345,000,
or almost 30%, less for missing just those initial six years. If our
fictional 26-year-old holds off 10 years until age 36, the nest egg
shrinks to $685,000, some $515,000, or nearly 45%, less than with the
early start. As Gilbert says in the commercial, “This gap between when
we should start saving and when we do is one of the reasons why too many
of us aren’t prepared for retirement.”
Lie #2: If I fall behind, I’ll make up for it with higher investment returns.
This rationale sounds convincing enough, but it implies you have
control over how much your investments earn. News flash: You don’t.
While you likely can improve investing results by sticking to low-cost index funds, you’re still pretty much at the mercy of whatever raw returns the financial markets deliver, which many pros expect to be considerably lower than there were in the past.
Of
course, you can try shooting for higher gains by, say, increasing the
percentage of your portfolio you invest in stocks or by channeling more
of your money into high-octane investments like technology and emerging
market shares, bu doing so necessarily means taking on more risk and
dramatically increasing the chance of your investing strategy going badly awry.
In short, anyone who thinks he can count on his investing prowess to
make up for poor retirement planning is deceiving himself or simply
doesn’t understand how the financial markets work. Either way, he’s playing a dangerous game.
Lie
#3: I don’t need to do a full-fledged retirement check-up. I have a
pretty good feel for where I stand without crunching the numbers.
Really? So you can assess in your head how much the savings you’ve
already accumulated will grow between now and the time you retire plus
how much you’ll save over the rest of your career will add to that
amount, and then gauge the probability that that the sum of those
figures will be able to support you over a retirement that could last upward of 30 years. Just when did you receive your Nobel Prize in economics?Fact is, the only way you can realistically gauge whether you’re on track toward a secure retirement—or, if you’re already retired, see whether you’re spending down your nest egg at a sustainable rate—is to plug information about your savings and investments into a retirement income calculator that can estimate your odds of retirement success (or hire an adviser who can do the analysis for you).
Even
that won’t guarantee 100% accuracy. After all, we’re talking about
projections, which are inherently squishy, especially when so many
variables (how the markets will perform, whether you’ll meet your saving
and spending targets, how long you’ll live) are involved. But by doing this sort of analysis
and then repeating it periodically—say, every year or so—you’ll be able
to get a sense of whether you’re moving closer or farther away from
your goal and then make gradual adjustments, if necessary, to get back
on course.
Lie #4: If all else fails, I’ll just work in retirement. Again, this assertion seems plausible at first glance. Indeed, the Employee Benefit Research Institute’s 2016 Retirement Confidence Survey reports that 67% of workers are planning to work for pay in retirement.
But
just as there’s a disconnect between when people say they’ll start
saving for retirement and when they actually do, so too is there a gap
between the number of people who claim they’ll work in retirement and
how many actually do. And in fact, the EBRI survey finds that only 27%
of retirees have actually worked for pay in retirement.
That’s
not to say that future retirees might not act differently, if for no
other reason that these days retirees can easily shop for jobs by going
to sites such as RetiredBrains.com and Retirementjobs.com.
But that doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll find a job that you enjoy or
that pays as much as you’d like, or that you’ll be as eager to hold down
a retirement job as you thought you would be before you retired.
Bottom line: Working periodically or part-time can be an excellent way to raise some extra spending cash and stay more socially engaged. But working is a better solution if you’re doing it because you really want to, not because you no other choice.
Culled from Money
No comments:
Post a Comment