New research calls the venerable 80% income-replacement rule into question
But in a recent article in Research magazine,
Michael Finke, a professor at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, notes
that the rule doesn’t necessarily reflect how a person’s income grows
while he or she is working — nor how expenses change and even decline in
retirement. What’s more, the guideline focuses on gross income rather
than take-home pay.
Consider: In retirement, you likely no longer
contribute to social security medicare and your retirement account. That
means your replacement rate is down to no more than 77% of your final
year’s salary — or 60% or less if you use average lifetime income, Finke
says.If you subtract other expenses — commuting and a lower federal income-tax bill (assuming you’re in a lower tax bracket in retirement than you were in your working years) — the replacement rate falls lower still.
“The 80% rule is wrong because it’s too simplistic,” Finke says. “Most of us don’t want to replace our gross income. We want to replace our paycheck.”
The guideline, he adds, is especially distorted for high-income Americans.
“The highest 20% of earners aren’t even spending half of their gross income,” he says. “So if you think they need 80% of their gross income, then they’d have to spend more in retirement than they’d ever spent during their working years — and this doesn’t sound like a good life plan.”
So, what’s a better way to figure out how much income you need?
First,
if you’re at, or very near, retirement, you can use your actual target
consumption, says David Blanchett, head of retirement research at
Morningstar Investment Management, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Chicago-based fund-research company Morningstar Inc. For those still
several years or more from leaving the office, the key is pinpointing
what specific expenses will change at retirement and adjusting one’s
replacement rate accordingly. “A household that is saving 20% of their
pay, for example, in a 401(k) needs to replace a lower percentage of
their final pay than one saving only 5% because they are used to living
off less,” Blanchett says.
Finke adds: “Most of the wealthiest
retirees don’t spend down their money at all. This means that if they
didn’t want to give it to their kids they could have had a lot more fun
when they were younger.”The story “How much retirement income will you need? Maybe less than you think” first appeared on WSJ.com
Culled from MarketWatch
No comments:
Post a Comment