A new
fiduciary standard applying to financial advisors of retirement
accounts, including individual retirement accounts, is expected to be
finalized by the Department of Labor within the next several months.
Even if the Republican-controlled Congress passes legislation to halt
the DOL rule-making process, President Obama will veto it, enabling the
biggest changes to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
since it was drafted 40 years ago.
"The ERISA fiduciary definition goes back to 1974, when there were no
401(k) plans and IRAs were still small," said Kevin Keller, CEO of the
Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards. "The world has changed
dramatically since then. It's time to update the rules."
Currently, registered investment advisors regulated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission or state securities regulators are already held
to a fiduciary standard of conduct under which they must act in their
clients' best interests. That means putting the client's needs before
their own, and if they don't, they can be sued by investors.
The CNBC editorial team presents our inaugural list of the Top 50 Money Management Firms .
Securities brokers, however, are regulated by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority under a "suitability" standard. The investments
they recommend must be suitable for investors, but they are not required
by law to act in their clients' best interests. Any disputes between
brokers and their clients are settled through an arbitration process.
"The new rule represents long-overdue consumer protection," said
Geoffrey Brown, CEO of the National Association of Personal Financial
Advisors, which also supports the DOL proposal. "It's time for this," he said.
Opponents of the proposed rule — predominantly organizations representing brokerage and asset management firms — contend that it will hurt many of the investors it is intended to protect.
"Our biggest concerns are reduced access to advice for the lower end of the investor spectrum and higher costs for individuals," said Andy Blocker, executive vice president of public policy and advocacy at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA). "Either investors will be put in an account where they pay more, or they'll get less service.
"As the rule is constructed, it's unfeasible to serve the market profitably on the lower end," he added.
Blocker said that the DOL rules are overly complex, have onerous
disclosure requirements for firms and will create new legal liabilities
for advisors to retirement accounts.
"These restrictions will upend the marketplace," he said.
There is no question
that the DOL proposals will force major changes on broker-dealers
currently managing 401(k) plans and advising on individual retirement
accounts. The new systems required to monitor advisors and produce
better disclosures for clients will cost a lot of money — some of which
will almost certainly be passed along to consumers.
"In the short term, costs will increase, but in the medium- to long
term, there will be more transparency in the market, and prices may
start to come down in time," said Marcia Wagner, head of the Wagner Law
Group, which focuses on ERISA law and employee benefits.
"Like every major regulatory project, there are positive and negative aspects to this," Wagner said.The DOL has had an extended comment period and has held hearings on its re-proposed rule — it initially tabled the rule in 2010 — and is expected to make significant changes to the proposal. Keller of the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards expects the department will relax some of the disclosure requirements and modify the rules about communications between advisors and prospective clients and likely give firms more time to comply with the rule.
He also expects it will change some of the details around the "best
interest contract" (BIC) exemption, which is the biggest change to the
DOL's original proposal. Advisors receiving commissions or other
compensation that might cause conflicts with their clients' interests
can receive an exemption as long as they adequately disclose and manage
those conflicts.
Blocker
at SIFMA said the BIC is unworkable as is, and if the DOL plans to make
substantial changes to it, it should put those changes out for public
comment and hearing again.
So will individual investors with small retirement accounts be left to
manage for themselves? Possibly. Wagner expects that some firms will
decide to exit the marketplace rather than revamp their operations.
However, there will be plenty of advisors willing to fill the breach
if firms choose to exit the business. Retirement plan sponsors and
participants may need to do some legwork, but there will be options.
"People may need to search out the experts in 401(k) plans and IRA
rollovers," she said. "If an advisor says they can no longer handle the
account, find someone who can. They are out there."
While the DOL proposal will significantly change the ground rules for
many advisors currently serving retirement accounts, it won't be the
massive upheaval that opponents of the rule suggest, said Keller.
In 2007, when the CFP board decided to require that CFPs follow the
fiduciary standard, industry opponents made similar gloomy predictions
about firms and advisors abandoning their certification. Since then, the
number of advisors with the CFP certification has risen by a third.
"This will change the way firms operate, but they will figure out how
to accommodate the new requirements," said Keller. "There are costs
involved, but the benefit to consumers of having their interests put
first far outweigh the expenses."
Additionally,
Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez unveiled on Monday the DOL's proposed
rule to clarify ERISA's application to state-run IRA programs. The
proposed regulation includes a rule modifying the payroll-deduction safe
harbor to allow for an ERISA exemption for auto-enroll
payroll-deduction IRAs offered by states as a default program where
there is a requirement for an employer to have a plan.
Culled from CNBC.com
No comments:
Post a Comment