Tuesday, 31 March 2015

3 ways to guarantee retirement income for life-By Kimberly Lankford



Money tree

Thinkstock
Annuities can be a tough sell. Retirees and those approaching retirement worry that they will die long before they recoup their investment. Add to this concern the years of low interest rates and the industry's reputation for high fees, and it's not surprising that annuity sales are relatively flat.

But the annuity industry is convinced it can attract a growing wave of baby boomers who remember all too well the 2008 market downturn. Insurance companies are rolling out a variety of products that they contend address the baby boom generation's desire for flexibility and choice -- as well as a need for guaranteed lifetime income.
And it's likely that many retirees will give annuities a second look following the federal government's decision to give some products a thumbs-up. The Treasury Department in July changed the tax rules so people can invest some of their 401(k) and IRA money in certain types of annuities without having to take required minimum distributions on the money.
Still, even interested boomers may be befuddled by the choices. It may be wise to ask a financial adviser to help analyze various annuities to find the best fit.

You probably don't need to consider an annuity if you have a guaranteed income stream from Social Security and pensions to cover your fixed costs -- or a nice nest egg that's sure to deliver a solid cash flow for life.
Simple, Efficient Guarantees
The simplest way to guarantee lifetime income is an immediate annuity: You hand over a lump sum to an insurance company, and it promises to pay you a fixed amount of money every year for the rest of your life. If a 65-year-old man invests $100,000 in an immediate annuity now, he can receive $6,515 per year for life. The income is reduced to $5,292 if the payouts continue for as long as he or his 65-year-old wife is alive.
A big drawback: Payouts are locked in based on today's low interest rates, and they never change, with inflation cutting into the value. In 20 years, the $6,515 would have purchasing power of $3,600 in today's dollars based on an inflation rate of 3%.

One way to add some protection against the loss in value is to set up a "ladder" of immediate annuities. Instead of investing the entire $100,000 now, perhaps you invest $20,000 each year for five years. You could benefit two ways. Interest rates could rise in later years. Plus, annual payments rise when you invest at an older age. A 70-year-old man who invests $100,000 in an immediate annuity now would receive $7,560 per year in income.
An immediate annuity may be a good choice for someone without a pension who needs money to cover fixed expenses starting immediately. Sure, you'll need to make the initial investment, but if one of the 65-year-old spouses in the example lives at least 19 years, the couple will recover the initial cost, and the guaranteed payments would protect against any investment downturns.
If you have enough money to cover 15 to 20 years, an immediate annuity may not be the most cost-efficient way to protect against outliving your savings. Deferred-income annuities focus on the bigger risk if you live into your eighties or beyond. You invest money in your fifties or sixties, when you're newly retired or near retirement, and set a payout start-up date for at least 10 years in the future. The later the date, the higher the annual payouts will be. Longevity annuities refer to products with a 20- to 25-year deferral.
If you invest $100,000 in a New York Life deferred-income annuity at age 55 and start payouts when you retire at 65, you'll receive $10,116 a year for life, for example. If payouts start at 80, you'll get $39,357 a year for life. Wait until 85, and your annual payouts will be $75,882.
Deferring to your eighties, when you might need the money most, may make sense. But it can be tough to stomach psychologically: You'll likely wonder if you will live long enough to get the payouts. "The right way to think about longevity annuities is as insurance rather than as an investment," says Katharine Abraham, director of the Maryland Center for Economics and Policy at the University of Maryland, and co-author of a recent annuity study for the Brookings Institution.
Knowing you'll get bigger payouts for your later years may encourage you to invest your other assets more aggressively. "By locking in some income in retirement, you're able to pursue more growth with the rest of your portfolio," says Brett Wollam, senior vice-president for Fidelity Investments Life Insurance. The company sells several types of annuities, including five deferred-income annuities from top insurers.
If you worry about an early demise, you can buy a deferred-income annuity that provides a cash refund for your heirs. This annuity promises that either you or your heirs will receive at least as much money back as you originally invested -- in return for a lower annual payout. The New York Life annuity with the cash refund would pay the man in the earlier example $30,547 a year if payouts start at age 80. If he died before the second payment, his heirs would get the balance of his $100,000 investment -- $69,453.
But adding a cash refund may not be a good deal. Stick with the barebones deferred-income annuity if you want the biggest payout and have reason to believe, based on your health and family medical history, that you will be alive when the payouts are set to kick in.
New on the market are deferred-income annuities designed especially for traditional IRAs, 401(k)s and other tax-deferred retirement plans. Before the new Treasury rule, people were reluctant -- and some were unable -- to place deferred-income annuities in their retirement accounts because of required minimum distributions, which begin in the year you turn age 70 1/2. If your annuity payouts don't start until age 80, how can you take an RMD at 70 1/2 without cashing out the annuity? Because of the RMD rule, some insurers would only allow people to invest in annuities with money from taxable accounts, while others required that investors start taking annuity payouts at 70.
The new Treasury rule lets you invest up to 25% of an IRA or 401(k) balance -- to a maximum of $125,000 -- in a "qualified longevity annuity contract" (called a QLAC) without having to take RMDs on that money.
With a QLAC, an investor plunks down some cash at age 60 or 65 and gets relatively large guaranteed payments starting perhaps 20 years later. Because it will be "easier for people to buy longevity annuities with payouts starting at age 80 or 85, these new regulations are a really huge deal," says Abraham.
American General, Lincoln Financial, Principal and Thrivent recently started selling these products, and New York Life expects to roll out its product in the summer. Cathy Weatherford, president of the Insured Retirement Institute, a trade group of companies focusing on retirement income, expects at least six insurers to sell QLACs in the next few months.
Before you settle on a longevity product, compare offerings, says Jerry Golden, president of Golden Retirement Advisors, an annuity consultant. As new products come on the market, some insurers will be offering better payouts than others based on one's age and deferral period. Golden expects to launch a tool in May that will enable buyers to compare pricing from a variety of insurers based on different options.

Michael Bartlow, a financial planner with Valic Financial Advisors, in Houston, says people have been asking him about QLACs as an IRA distribution avoidance strategy as well as for the income guarantees. By shifting up to $125,000 of your IRA or 401(k) out of the RMD calculation, you can reduce your income-tax bill.
Variable Annuities With Guarantees
Despite the simplicity of deferred-income annuities, many people are hesitant to hand over a lump sum to an insurer without an option for withdrawal. The variable annuity with income guarantees offers such an option. Later in life, you are likely to get higher payouts with a deferred-income annuity without a cash refund for heirs. But a variable annuity gives you the ability to withdraw your principal.
With a variable annuity, you basically have two parallel accounts: your investment account and your "benefit base." With your investment account, you invest in a menu of mutual funds offered by the insurer. Meanwhile, your benefit base, which is based on the initial investment, is guaranteed to grow by a certain percentage each year, typically 5% or 6% -- no matter how your actual investments perform.
The other guarantee is the percentage you can withdraw from your growing benefit base. Typically, you can withdraw 5% a year for the rest of your life starting at age 65, or 4.5% per year for joint-life payouts with a spouse, says Mark Cortazzo, a certified financial planner with Macro Consulting Group, in Parsippany, N.J.

Say you invest $100,000 at 55 and your benefit base is guaranteed to grow by 5% until age 65. (After 10 years, many annuities stop boosting the total size of the benefit base.) If you have a 5% withdrawal guarantee, you can get a payout of $8,144 a year on a total benefit base of $162,889 -- even if your actual investment declines. That's less than the deferred-income annuity's payout of $10,116 after 10 years in the earlier example. Plus, you have the option with the deferred-income annuity of boosting your payout even more -- $39,357 if you wait until age 80 -- which you cannot do with a variable annuity.
Of course, by waiting to start your deferred-income annuity payouts, you forgo years of annual $8,144 payments you would have gotten if you had opted for the variable annuity. However, at age 84, the deferred-income annuity pulls ahead of the variable annuity in total payments. And the gap grows bigger because the owner of the variable annuity will continue to get $8,144 a year, while the owner of the deferred-income annuity will continue getting $39,357 a year.
Still, says Fidelity's Wollam, a desire for flexibility and growth potential could come into play when choosing an annuity. "These types of preferences will drive the best choice for you," he says.
With a variable annuity, if your actual investments grow faster than the benefit base guarantee, your payout could rise -- so in the example above, you could eventually get a bigger payout than $8,144. Another advantage is that you have the flexibility to stop guaranteed payouts and take a lump sum from your investment account. When you take a lump sum, the annuity company will subtract from your investment account the total amount of your payouts. The size of the lump sum will depend on your investments' performance.
Variable annuities can be very complicated for investors to compare. "There are a lot more moving parts with the current offerings, and it is a lot more difficult to generalize than in the past," Cortazzo says.

Before choosing a variable annuity, compare the fees, surrender charges and investing options. Also, compare the guaranteed monthly payouts starting in the year you plan to withdraw. This analysis can be daunting to do on your own. Cortazzo's Annuity Review service.
Lynn and Frank Tracadas of Austin, Tex., recently asked Cortazzo to review a variable annuity with guarantees that they bought in 2008, right as the stock market started to fall. At that time, Lynn was 61 and Frank was 80, and they bought the annuity to provide lifetime income. They wanted to make sure the income could continue as long as either Lynn or Frank lived.
Because the couple bought the annuity in the midst of the market downturn, they originally invested the money conservatively, with 60% in fixed-income and cash. "We were in defensive mode," Lynn says. Knowing they had the guarantee, they gradually shifted more of their money in the annuity into more aggressive investments. If they keep the money in the variable annuity for a total of 10 years, the benefit base is guaranteed to double from their original investment and they can withdraw 5% of that money each year for the rest of their lives. "We have no intention to take the money out before 10 years," Lynn says.
When deciding which type of annuity -- if any -- is best for you, you need to look at your specific income needs and other investments. Two people of the same age with the same portfolio size may have different income needs based on their lifestyle, as well as their Social Security and pension streams.

First, estimate how much money you'll need each month in retirement to pay your essential bills, such as housing, food, transportation, insurance and health care expenses. Subtract any sources of lifetime income, such as a pension and Social Security. Then figure out how to fill in the gap, which could be from a combination of annuities and other investments.


Culled from Kiplinger in Yahoo Finance

Monday, 30 March 2015

4 Benefits of Working Past Retirement Age- Brian Wu

 Source: Thinkstock


It’s unfortunate that many senior citizens do not have a choice when it comes to working past the age of 65. However, the senior citizens that do have a choice and end up retiring at that age may be doing themselves a disservice. It is important to consider the advantages of working past the age of 65 from a financial and personal perspective. Some people with disabilities may not have a choice in the matter. However, an increasing number of senior citizens retain their health well into old age, and they will have options galore when it comes to working.

1. Retirement funds can go fast

Improvements in medicine and senior care have changed the financial situation of a lot of senior citizens. People are much more likely to live past the age of 90 today, meaning the funds and pensions that senior citizens accumulate during their working years are going to have to last much longer than they would have 30 or 40 years ago. An increasing number of senior citizens will simply run out of money if they are not prepared, forcing them to go back to work at menial jobs at the worse time.
However, senior citizens that continue to work past the age of 65 can continue to save money while living off of what they earn, thus forgoing the need to dip into their retirement savings. In some cases, working just a few short years can make a huge difference in the amount of money you have in retirement, putting you in a much better situation when the day comes that you give up work for good.

Source: Thinkstock
 
Source: Thinkstock

2. Medical expenses

Senior citizens tend to have higher needs when it comes to medical expenses than any other age group. While senior citizens typically have insurance and government medical benefits, not everything is going to be covered. Far too many elderly people are in a situation in which they have to draw on their savings in order to pay for something medically-related and in some extreme circumstances some senior citizens are even forced to choose between medication or other necessities of life.
For seniors that choose to continue working, not only will their income be higher, but they will also enjoy the benefits that are often provided by their employer. These benefits often cover far more than some of the retirement benefits, and many even include prescription drug plans that make medications far cheaper to purchase, or even free, depending on the type of coverage offered. This allows seniors to spend less of their own money on medical needs, allowing them to divert those funds toward retirement or even a luxury here and there.

3. The psychology of retiring

While many people look forward to enjoying the freedom associated with retirement, it isn’t without its mental and emotional costs. For one thing, senior citizens that stay in the workforce are much more likely to retain their cognitive ability. Many senior citizens become isolated after retirement, which is going to have widespread psychological consequences for anyone. Senior citizens that stay in the workforce are also going to be that much more likely to stay up-to-date with technology, since technological changes will have an effect on each and every workforce.

4. Financial benefits of continued work

There are numerous financial reasons you should keep working if you feel up to it. The first financial benefit from working is pretty obvious: you keep earning income. This steady paycheck allows you to continue to pay for your expenses of your life without needing to turn to your retirement benefits for necessities. If you choose to keep working, a financial adviser can tell you how best to make sure you don’t get overtaxed for staying in the workforce, making your retirement money go further.
Most people are still going to retire at some point, even if it’s after 65. If they work into their seventies or later, they will get much larger pensions in the process compared to what they would receive if they’d stopped working only a decade ago. Workers who stay in a company for longer will also get employee benefits that are only granted to people that have stayed in the company for an extended period of time. Even social security benefits tend to be elevated for people that have stayed in the workforce for longer. It all comes down to this: the longer you work, the more money you can save and contribute to both your retirement funds and social security. Therefore, when you do finally retire, you will be able to draw more out of your retirement each month.
With all the benefits of working past age 65, it’s a wonder more people don’t choose to do it. By simply working a few extra years, you can easily put yourself in a much better financial situation, allowing you to save and spend more when you do decide to take a permanent vacation from the office.

Culled from wallstreetcheatsheet

Friday, 27 March 2015

4 of the Best Credit Cards for Fraud Protection- Sheiresa Ngo


Source: Thinkstock
 
Source: Thinkstock
If you’ve ever been a victim of credit card fraud, you know how disconcerting it can be. A recent Gallup study finds that roughly 69% of Americans worry about having their credit card information stolen by hackers targeting stores. Smartphone and computer hacking was second, with 62% reporting fears about this crime. In fact, consumers reported that they worry about data breaches more than any other crime they were polled about.
The Gallup report also revealed that 27% of Americans said they or another member of their household had information from a credit card stolen by hackers within the last year. So what can you do about credit card fraud?
“We all can take some proactive steps to help decrease our chances of becoming a victim of credit card fraud. Be careful of the websites that you use to shop online. Check to make sure that it’s a reputable website before you enter your credit card information,” says Certified Public Accountant and Attorney Sonya Smith-Valentine.
Smith-Valentine recommends filing a police report and placing a freeze on your credit if you discover that you have become a victim of credit card fraud.
“Contact the credit card company immediately so they can cancel your card. Also, let the company know which charges you didn’t make. Place a freeze on your credit reports so the thief can’t open any new accounts with your information. Also review your credit reports to see if there are any new accounts you didn’t open. Also make sure to file a police report. Many credit card companies will ask for a police report,” says Smith-Valentine.
Under federal law, consumers are generally liable up to $50 for fraudulent credit and debt-signature card transactions. Debit-PIN transactions have no liability coverage unless it cannot be proven that you provided the PIN that was used to withdraw the money. A report by Cardhub provides a list of the best credit cards when it comes to fraud protection. Most of the credit cards on this list offer coverage beyond federal limits.
John Moore/Getty Images
 
John Moore/Getty Images

4. American Express


Consumer Liability:

  • Credit: $0
  • Debit (signature): $0 (This refers to prepaid debit cards; American Express does not offer traditional debit cards
  • Debit (PIN): Not applicable (American Express does not offer debit cards with PINs)
  • ATM transactions: $0
For more information, read about American Express’ fraud protection.
Source: Thinkstock
 
Source: Thinkstock

3. Discover


Consumer Liability:

  • Credit: $0
  • Debit (Signature): $0
  • Debit (PIN): $0
  • ATM transactions: $0
For more information, read about Discover’s fraud protection.
Source: Thinkstock
 
Source: Thinkstock

2.  MasterCard


Consumer Liability:

  • Credit: $0
  • Debit (signature): $0
  • Debit (PIN): $0 liability if the transaction is processed by MasterCard. There is no liability protection above what the law provides if transaction is not processed by MasterCard.
  • ATM transactions: Federal law applies.
For more information, see MasterCard’s Zero Liability Policy.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
 
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

1. Visa


Consumer Liability:

  • Credit: $0
  • Debit (signature): $0
  • Debit (PIN): $0 liability if the transaction is processed by Visa. There is no additional liability protection above what the law provides if the transaction is not processed by Visa.
  • ATM Transactions: Liability is with the issuer.
 Note that the zero liability does not apply to transactions made through Visa corporate or Visa purchasing card or account transactions.
For more information, see Visa’s  Zero Liability Policy.

Culled from wallstreetcheatsheet

Thursday, 26 March 2015

Managing Customer to have the best -Odunze Reginald






Image credited to bmas.de


In 1897, an Italian Economist, Vilfredo Pareto came up with a principle which he called (Principle of Least Effort).  He stated that 80 percent of our success comes from 20 percent of our effort. The rule went on say that 20 percent of our customers give us 80 percent of our business. And 80 percent give us 20 percent of our business. Hence the need to focus more on those that gives us the greatest business.
He called it the 80\20 Rule but his admirer called it “The Pareto Principle” with the advent of the 80\20 Rule came with it other rules, like 90\10 Rule of Money
But according to Robert Kiyosaki (2000) he stated that “The 90\10 rule of money states that 10 percent hold 90 percent of the economy and 90 percent hold 10 percent of the economy”.
From these presentations, it should be noted that the principle of least effort expected us to find ways of satisfying those customers who give us the greatest business, provide us with the necessary incomes to boost our business, is it not wise to device special means of satisfying these customers.
These customers have the enabling economy to provide for us all that we need as an organization to meet our obligations to shareholders, government, to our employees and to the board.
Continuing Kiyosaki “noted that there are two types of money problem, one problem is not enough money and the other is too much money.” He went on to say that it has been said that that there is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come and there is nothing as detrimental than someone who is thinking old ideas,”


Odunze Reginald C is the Lead Consultant, Chareg Consulting.
You can follow our anchor at twitter @regydunze, and our Face book @reginald odunze.com , You can also check us at pensionsbenefit.com

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

10 countries with the worst retirement security-By Andrea Coombes


Congolese soldiers from FARDC take a break during their offence against the rebels from the FDLR in Kirumba village of Rutshuru territory in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
.

Congolese soldiers from the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC) take a break during their offence against the rebels from the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) in Kirumba village of Rutshuru territory in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, February 27, 2015. Congolese government forces ousted rebels from hills in heavy fighting in North Kivu province on Friday, an army spokesman said, cranking up a campaign to crush an insurgency at the heart of two decades of conflict. The rebel ranks contain remnants of fighters involved in neighbouring Rwanda's genocide in 1994. Since moving into chaotic eastern Congo, they have sought to exploit the region's rich deposits of gold, diamonds and tin and waged periodic war with the Kinshasa government and other armed groups. Picture taken February 27, 2015. REUTERS/Kenny Katombe (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO - Tags: CIVIL UNREST CRIME LAW MILITARY POLITICS SOCIETY)
Northern Europe figures prominently at the top of a new index that ranks countries on retirement security, but the 10 countries at the other end of the scale are all in sub-Saharan Africa, according to a new report that ranks the outlook for retirees in 150 countries. The top 10 countries share common characteristics that are good news for retirees: developed economies, high-quality health-care systems and robust social safety nets. The U.S. ranked No. 19 for the third year in a row. But the countries at the bottom of the list? Not so much. Some of them have been ravaged by decades of violent conflict; all of them lack quality health care, according to the Natixis Global Retirement Index, published by Natixis Global Asset Management. The study is based on data from the World Bank and World Health Organization, among other sources. The countries are measured on criteria such as access to health care, life expectancy, unemployment, income equality, tax burden, savings yields, investment environment, the country’s overall financial stability, and quality of life, including whether the country provides “a clean, safe environment in which to live,” according to the report. Here are the 10 countries that fare the worst in retirement security, out of 150 countries:
141. Mali2014 ranking: 143

.
A protester holds a sign at a rally for Malian unity in Bamako September 25, 2014. (REUTERS/Joe Penney)
A protester holds a sign at a rally for Malian unity in Bamako September 25, 2014. (REUTERS/Joe Penney)
Mali is home to world-famous musicians, including Salif Keita and Oumou Sangare, and for more than a decade has hosted the Festival in the Desert, where artists from Mali have been joined onstage by international stars, such as U2’s Bono and others. But the festival currently is on hold due to civil unrest in the country, and that violent conflict is also a key factor negatively affecting the outlook for retirees there. While Mali’s retirement outlook overall is the best among the 10 lowest-ranked nations, the country is among the lowest scorers on health care, garnering just 9% on the health-care subindex. Only Sierra Leone fares worse on that measure, scoring 8% for health care. While some of the worst-performing countries are inching toward greater stability, any successes may be fragile. For example, falling energy prices may hurt some countries, said David Lafferty, chief market strategist with Natixis Global Asset Management.
142. Burundi
2014 ranking: 147

.
A voter goes to a voting booth to make her mark at a polling station in Bujumbura, Burundi. (AP Photo/Marc Hofer)
A voter goes to a voting booth to make her mark at a polling station in Bujumbura, Burundi. (AP Photo/Marc Hof …
After decades of violent conflict, Burundi has made “important democratic gains” in recent years, according to Human Rights Watch, a nonprofit, nonpartisan advocacy group. (Of note, Human Rights Watch said Burundi’s gains are being undermined by the government’s recent arrests of journalists.) Burundi has also made gains in retirement security, moving to No. 142 on the index, from No. 147 a year ago. The country’s overall higher ranking is due in part to a better score on the “material well-being” subindex — which measures per capita income, income equality and unemployment — where it garnered a 21% score, up from 8% a year earlier, according to the Natixis report. Still, the measure has proved volatile: Burundi scored 36% on material well-being in 2013.
143. Liberia
2014 ranking: 138.
Mercy Kennedy cries as community activists approach her outside her home on 72nd SKD Boulevard in Monrovia, Liberia, a day after her mother was taken ...
Mercy Kennedy cries as community activists approach her outside her home on 72nd SKD Boulevard in Monrovia, Liberia, …
In 2014, Liberia was ravaged by the Ebola virus, with more than 3,800 deaths through Feb. 7 this year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But even without that crisis, Liberia and the other nations that rank among the 10 worst for retirement security face deep-seated structural and economic problems. “In general, these nations lack modern infrastructure and have nonexistent or underdeveloped health-care systems,” the Natixis report said. “They have some of the lowest levels of income per capita and are often burdened with substantial barriers to economic development, such as high levels of inflation and sovereign debt. Furthermore, improvement in key indicators seems unlikely in the short term due to these chronic economic issues.”
144. Niger
2014 ranking: 148

.
Soldiers stop to buy goods at the main market of Diffa, Niger. (REUTERS/Joe Penney)
Soldiers stop to buy goods at the main market of Diffa, Niger. (REUTERS/Joe Penney)
Retirement security is probably low on the list of concerns of Niger’s citizens. The country’s neighbor to the south, Nigeria, is in a fight against the militant group Boko Haram, and that conflict is spilling over into Niger’s borders, in the form of raids and other violence. The government in Niger recently agreed to send military troops as part of a regional offensive against Boko Haram, according to recent news reports. To make matters worse, Niger is ranked in the bottom 30 countries on measures of health care, finances in retirement, quality of life and material well-being, according to the Natixis index of retirement security.
145. Sierra Leone
2014 ranking: 139.
A quarantined home in Port Loko, Sierra Leone. (AP Photo/Michael Duff)
A quarantined home in Port Loko, Sierra Leone. (AP Photo/Michael Duff)
Sierra Leone and Liberia have the sad fate of vying for the position of country worst-hit by the 2014 Ebola outbreak, with Sierra Leone suffering from a higher number of cases but lower number of deaths than Liberia, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Feb. 7. It’s no surprise, perhaps, that Sierra Leone logged the lowest score on the health subindex of the Natixis retirement study, scoring just 8%, “due to an underdeveloped health-care system, poor medical infrastructure and low levels of physicians per capita, which results in low life expectancy and high infant mortality rates,” the report said. At the other end of the heath-care scale, Austria scored 88%. The U.S. came in at 80%.
146. Lesotho
2014 ranking: 144

.
A woman carries grain to feed for her animals in a field near Maseru, Lesotho. (AP Photo)
A woman carries grain to feed for her animals in a field near Maseru, Lesotho. (AP Photo)
Lesotho is a small, impoverished country entirely surrounded by South Africa, with one of the highest rates of HIV in the world — 23% of adults, according to 2012 data from the CIA’s World Fact Book. Recent political instability is another problem. In Lesotho and similar countries, retirement “is not in the forefront” of people’s minds, said Natixis’s Lafferty. Residents “are really living just to get by. They’re not really saving money in any type of government- or workplace-sponsored plan.”
147. Comoros
2014 ranking: 149

.
An Anjouan woman walks through the Medina near the main port of Anjouan, Comoros. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)
An Anjouan woman walks through the Medina near the main port of Anjouan, Comoros. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)
Comoros, a tiny island nation in the Indian Ocean, is one of the world’s poorest countries, according to the CIA’s World Fact Book, which notes that Comoros is slightly more than 12 times the size of Washington, D.C. In the Natixis retirement-security report, Comoros logged just 10% on the “material well-being” subindex, which includes per capita income, income equality and unemployment — the lowest score of all but one of the 150 countries studied. Central African Republic also scored 10% on that measure; South Africa scored the lowest, at 8%.
148. Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)2014 ranking: 145.
People carry bags of charcoal on their bikes as they go down a hill in Mweso, Democratic Republic of Congo. (AP Photo/Melanie Gouby)
People carry bags of charcoal on their bikes as they go down a hill in Mweso, Democratic Republic of Congo. (AP …
Most of the countries in the bottom of the ranking for retirement security still manage to score relatively well on one measure: finances in retirement, which includes retirees’ ability to preserve savings and the soundness of the country’s financial system, according to the Natixis report. The DRC is no exception, scoring 45% on the retirement-finances subindex, higher than Argentina’s 42% and Venezuela’s 35%. So why do the countries with the riskiest retirement outlook score so well on that measure? One word: taxes. Thanks to low tax rates, a number of African countries see their retirement-security score rise. These countries “certainly have less tax pressure,” said David Lafferty, chief market strategist with Natixis Global Asset Management. They also have a much less robust social infrastructure than the countries at the top of the retirement-security index, he said.
149. Central African Republic2014 ranking: 140

.
A Christian mob attacks a mosque in Bangui, Central African Republic. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)
A Christian mob attacks a mosque in Bangui, Central African Republic. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)
In the three years of the Natixis retirement-security index, the Central African Republic has posted a stubbornly low score on the “quality of life” subindex. “The countries toward the very bottom of the list tended to remain in fairly stable positions,” the report said. There is, unfortunately, a reason for that. “Tragically, many of the countries are, or have recently been, war zones. For instance, Syria, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Central African Republic, Mali, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Libya,” the report said. Since mid-2013, thousands of people have been killed and many more displaced in ongoing violence in the Central African Republic, according to a Feb. 10 story on Reuters.com.
150. Togo2014 ranking: 146

.
Togo troops clear rocks from the road during clashes with protesters calling for the president to withdraw from a presidential vote in March 2015, in ...
Togo troops clear rocks from the road during clashes with protesters calling for the president to withdraw from …
Despite the fact that Togo managed to garner 20% on the health-care measure (a relatively robust score compared with Sierra Leone’s 8% and Mali’s 9%), retirees in Togo face substantial risks, particularly on measures of quality of life. “Due to high levels of pollution and few resources in terms of disease prevention, these nations score low in the quality of life/natural environment subindex, with most countries scoring under 50% and the lowest score being 7% for Togo,” the report said.



Culled from MarketWatch

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

5 Steps to Creating an Income Plan for Retirement -AdviceIQ

You’ve saved for years. Now that retirement is here (or near), how do you create an income plan from your savings? There are five steps.
We, as an industry, constantly talk about the need to save for retirement. Put money into your 401(k), contribute to your individual retirement accounts, and one day, when you are ready to retire, that savings become income for you. How does that actually happen? We walk our clients through a structure that seems to work well. Here’s a general overview.
1. Determine how much you need to spend to live a life you enjoy. This is always our first question. The answer ultimately drives the rest of the decisions. How much money do you need each month to cover your essential expenses, and to also cover the fun things that you’d like to do in retirement?
Tracking this spending for the first few years of retirement is critical, since expenses can run higher than expected. You should be aware of these fluctuations and make adjustments accordingly.
2. Make the most of income sources other than your savings. There’s a tremendous amount of benefit that some smart planning can do for you. For example, choices like when to start taking Social Security can cut your retirement income by 25% or boost it by an additional 32%. Married couples can use strategies like claiming spousal benefits to increase income substantially.
If your income comes in the form of rental properties, then do you need to factor in expenses for maintenance? Should you hire a property management company so that you don’t have to take phone calls from tenants while you’re on vacation? Run through the numbers for your personal situation and make the right decision.
Source: iStock


 
Source: iStock
3. Decide how much risk you are comfortable with. Your level of comfort with risk determines how you allocate your portfolio. In retirement, people usually don’t want much risk. Our clients often express a concern about markets and fluctuation. Yet the reality is that for a 30-to-40-year retirement with inflating expenses every year, some allocation to growth assets is helpful if not necessary.
4. Figure out how much income you need your savings to generate every year. The amount is your total estimated expenses minus your Social Security, pensions or real estate income. Once you know how much you need each year, you can then begin to formulate a distribution strategy, which we will cover in more detail in an upcoming post.
5. Identify how much you want to leave to your heirs. For some clients, this is a top priority; for others, they want to spend as much as possible while they can. Like most planning questions, there are no right or wrong answers. If you plan to leave behind a substantial inheritance, just be aware that it might place limitations on your income.
These are the five simple but important steps that decide your ability to live the life you want in retirement.


Culled from wallstreetcheatsheet

Monday, 23 March 2015

5 things you need to retire early and comfortably-By David Ning


Retirees
Thinkstock
While you certainly need a substantial nest egg to retire early, those who are happy in early retirement usually share a few common traits. You will need to be able to cope with financial shocks and to fill your days will new activities so you don't become bored. For aspiring early retirees, here's a list of goals worth shooting for:
You are willing to tune out market gyrations. Most early retirees need the help of growing equities to sustain their lifestyle for decades. But markets are volatile, and it's hard to hang on during a bear market. And the more you look at your investments, the harder it is to hold on. That's why successful early retirees often develop a strategy they feel comfortable with and then don't monitor the market constantly. That way, they won't feel as much anxiety with the daily gyrations, which ultimately helps them keep more money by staying the course.
You know your expenses. Some people project their retirement expenses as a percentage of their current income, but how much a retiree needs to save has nothing to do with his final salary. What you really need is to start estimating your expenses once you no longer have to work. From there, you can determine how much you will need to draw from your assets each year and can calculate a savings goal you need your nest egg to hit. Knowing exactly how much you spend on a monthly basis and that your nest egg can cover those expenses indefinitely can certainly ease many of your financial worries. Tracking your expenses also makes cutting spending without much sacrifice a lot easier.
You are comfortable earning income again if the need arises. You may never need to go back to work, but it's comforting to know that the option is always there. And just a tiny bit of additional income in retirement can make a huge difference because you can put a bit less stress on your portfolio whenever valuations head south. A retirement job can be a last resort that actually isn't that bad, and it could even be fun if you find an ideal position. At the very least, you won't have to significantly reduce your withdrawal rates and cut spending every time the market turns south.
You feel at peace about family dynamics. It's not always a good idea for young people, even if they have managed to save a boatload of money, to retire early. Your financial situation can change quickly once you get married or have kids. A changing family situation affects spending so much that none of the previous calculations make any sense anymore. Day care alone in certain parts of the country can cost $20,000 each year. Add that into the mix and you are looking at a completely different financial situation. If you expect your family situation to change, you probably aren't ready to retire just yet.
You are self-motivated to find new activities to fill the day. While it is fun to dream of retiring early during a stressful time at work, not everyone will actually be happy without work to fill their day. It takes initiative to get off the couch as an early retiree. Instead of running into people at work-related events, you must pick up the phone to call your friends to go out. You need to get over the nervousness of trying something new, and drive to the places you want to visit. Those who sit around all day quickly find that the days get boring, and a lack of social interaction and exercise can also start to impact your health. And let's face it, without a healthy body, nothing is enjoyable anyway.
Aiming to become an early retiree requires the discipline to save and stick to a budget. But happy retirees also need to be able to find meaningful ways to spend their time.


Culled from US News

Friday, 20 March 2015

The best places to retire in 2015-By William P. Barrett


Handout photo of a portion of Browns Canyon in Colorado Springs
A portion of Browns Canyon, located 90 miles (145 km) west of Colorado Springs, Colorado is pictured in this undated handout photo provided by Trout Unlimited and obtained by Reuters on February 19, 2015. U.S. President Barack Obama announced the designation of Browns Canyon, a picturesque gorge in the Rocky Mountains as national monument February 19, 2015. REUTERS/Trout Unlimited/Handout via Reuters (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS ENVIRONMENT) ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. REUTERS IS UNABLE TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY, CONTENT, LOCATION OR DATE OF THIS IMAGE. THIS PICTURE IS DISTRIBUTED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR SALE FOR MARKETING OR ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. NO ARCHIVES. NO SALES
 
Let's face it. After retirement, most people are going to have less income than before. But at the same time they'll have the opportunity to do something about it--like move to a place with cheaper costs, or at least one more to their liking in terms of population density, climate or economic growth. It's a big country and there are a huge variety of places out there.
Toward that end, Forbes has pinpointed 25 communities of wildly differing sizes and styles for its 2015 list of The Best Places To Retire. This year's edition include entries in 19 states in all four time continental zones. Five states--Texas, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky and Arizona--have two or more listings. Most of our picks are in climates considered warm or moderate. But not all. Fargo, N.D. is back on for the fifth straight year, joined by some other places with cold winters, including Great Falls, Mont.; Casper, Wyo., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Colorado Springs.
Nine of the entries were also on last year's list. All but three--Port Charlotte, Fla.; Raleigh, N.C.; and Rochester, Minn.--have been on some Forbes retirement list in the past five years.
As in previous years, our emphasis continues to be our highlighting places that offer what we consider good retirement value.
There are a number of reasons why on our towns may come and go from our list, including changes in relative underlying economics. Each year we screen more and more cities, and the competition gets more intense.

This year, we weighed data on nearly 500 cities from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The most important factors were economic: overall cost of living and home prices as compared with national averages, and general state tax climate for retirees (a point that Forbes has been tracking for years.) These are also the main reasons why there are just a few locations (Pittsburgh, Pa., and the Portland, Ore., suburb of Oak Grove) in the pricey Northeast and West Coast.
If money is no object, we have a list for that: 25 Top Places To Retire Rich.
For cost of living, we largely used data from bestplaces,net. Home prices came from a number of sources: quarterly reports of the National Association of Realtors, trulia.com, zillow.com, topix.net, bestplaces.net, realestate.com and coldwellbanker.com
Assuming money is a consideration, cutting housing costs in retirement may be a big objective. According to the Realtors, the average national price of single-family home is $208,700, up 1% in a year. Seven places on our list come in at less than $150,000. The lowest is Pittsburgh at $133,000, followed by Bowling Green, Ky., $138,000; Athens, Ga, $139,000, and Lexington, Ky, $143,000. Three have a typical price more than 10% above the average: Oak Grove, $279,000; Casper, Wyo., $245,000; and Blacksburg, Va., $235,000.

Cost-of-living is expressed as an index, with 100 being the national average. We generally look for places with indexes no higher than 105. Two on the list are higher: Oak Grove (115) and Boise, Id. (107). Five places have indexes at 90 or lower, meaning at least 10% below the national average: Abilene and San Angelo, Tex. (83), Pittsburgh (84), Bowling Green (89) and Lincoln, Neb. (90).
With a significant number of retirees working at least part-time, especially in their early years, we also take into account estimates of current and future economic prosperity. This might also provide a boost to home prices down the road if you decide to sell. These stats include local unemployment rate as compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and future growth projections as gauged by the Milken Institute. For January 2015, the national unemployment rate was 5.4%, the lowest in years. Only one place on the list is substantially above that, Tucson, at 5.9%. Most are below, and sometimes way below: Fargo, N.D., 2.9%, Rochester, Minn. and San Angelo, both 3.1%; and Abilene, 3.2%.
Our consideration of a state’s tax climate for retirees takes into account the notion that what is low tax for retirees isn’t always the same as for working-age folks. Nine states don’t have a broad-based state income tax–Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.  But such states tend to make up for that with other, higher taxes, most notably, higher sales and real estate levies, which can hit seniors harder. On the other hand, many states with income taxes give special breaks to retirees, such as light or no taxation of Social Security and pension benefits, and inheritances. In our view, the best states for retirees from a tax perspective are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and West Virginia.
Seniors rightly worry about physical as well as economic security. So we also give weight to violent crime rates for cities and their surrounding areas as calculated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.We look at the number of doctors per capita as a proxy for the accessibility of health care. We also take into account the latest Milken Institute report on "Best Cities For Successful Aging." The study evaluates and ranks 352 metropolitan areas using a variety of factors touching on health care, wellness, transportation. living arrangements and economics.
Besides safety, retirees now want to keep fit and active. So we look at ratings for attributes that encourage an active retirement. One we use is Bicycling Magazine‘s ratings of cities for “bikability”. High grades here go to Boise, Columbia, Mo.; Colorado Springs, Pittsburgh and Tucson.
Another is walkscore.com ratings for walkability, or the ability to shop and get places on foot (great for both exercise and non-reliance on cars). Top grades go to Lexington, Ky.; Athens, Ga., and Pittsburgh.
Considerations beyond our ability to assess include personal tastes and needs, such as staying near friends and family. We also don't directly evaluate intangible qualities such as cultural milieu and scenic beauty. But perhaps 10 cities on this list might be considered college towns, which often provide enhanced cultural and other opportunities for their communities. This group consists of Athens (University of Georgia), Blacksburg (Virginia Tech), Bowling Green (Western Kentucky University), Columbia (University of Missouri, Stephens College, Columbia College), Lexington (University of Kentucky, Transylvania University), Lincoln (University of Nebraska), Pittsburgh (University of Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University, Duquesne University, Chatham University), Raleigh, N.C. (North Carolina State University, Shaw University), San Marcos, Tex. (Texas State University) and Tucson, Ariz. (University of Arizona).
And a fair number of our 25 offer mountain or water environments, including Asheville, Blacksburg, Boise, Cape Coral, Casper, Colorado Springs, Great Falls, Logan, Utah; and Port Charlotte.
Our list is in alphabetical order. That means there’s no significance to where a place falls on the list.
Abilene, Texas
PROS: Robust economy, cost of living 17% below national average, average home price $142,000 (national average: $209,000). Low rate of violent crime. High number of doctors per capita, high rank on Milken Institute of best cities for successful aging. Warm climate.
CON: Not very walkable.
NOTED: Average tax climate and air quality. Population 120,000. On list last year.
TRIVIA: Founded as a railroad shipping town for cattle.
Asheville, North Carolina
PROS: Strong economy amid scenic terrain and good weather, cost of living 3% below national norm, average home price $206,000. Abundant doctors. High volunteering culture.
CON: Low walkability assessment, Milken aging rank.
NOTED: Average air quality, serious crime rate, tax climate. Population 87,000. On list in 2012 and 2013.
TRIVIA: City inspired Thomas Wolfe's first novel in 1929, Look Homeward, Angel: A Story of The Buried Life.
Athens, Georgia
PROS: Good tax climate in bustling college town (University of Georgia). Cost of living 1% below U.S. average, average home price $139,000. Low serious crime rate. High Milken aging rank and walkability index.
CON: Middling economy.
NOTED: Average doctors per capita, weather and air quality. Population 120,000. On various Forbes retirement lists in past.
TRIVIA: World's only double-barreled cannon--which never worked--is on display at City Hall.
Blacksburg, Virginia
PROS: Economically booming college town (Virginia Tech). Average home price $235,000. Above average air quality. Low crime rate. High Milken aging rank.
CONS: Cost of living 2% above national average.
NOTED: Average tax climate, doctors per capita and walkability. Mild climate. Population 44,000. Repeat listee from last year.
TRIVIA: Named two centuries ago for town's founder.
Boise, Idaho
PROS: Strong state capital economy. Typical home price $175,000. Good tax climate. Low serious crime rate. High Milken aging rank. Strong marks for bikeability and volunteerism.
CONS: Overall cost of living 7% above U.S. average, below average air quality, not too walkable.
NOTED: Low humidity but cold winters. Population 215,000. On last year's list.
TRIVIA: No agreement on where city's name came from.
Bowling Green, Kentucky
PROS: Vibrant, growing economy in college town (Western Kentucky University). Cost of living 11% below national average, average home price just $138,000, good tax climate. Low crime rate, high Milken aging rating.
CONS: Low walkability rank.
NOTED: Average doctors per capita, mild climate and air quality. Population 61,000. Repeat entry on list.
TRIVIA: Home of the National Corvette Museum.
Cape Coral, Florida
PROS: Rosy economy in half-century-old Gulf of Mexico coast city developed with a master plan. Cost of living 4% below national average, with home prices also slightly national average, at $190,000. Good weather, above average air quality, low serious crime rate.
CONS: Low Milken aging rank, low walkability.
NOTED: Average tax climate, average physicians per capita. Population 166,000. Returnee from last year's list.
TRIVIA: City's 400 miles of canals may be tops in the world.
Casper, Wyoming
PROS: Bracing economy and low unemployment in scenic, mile-high city. Cost of living at the national average, average home prince $245,000. Above average air quality. Low serious crime rate. High Milken aging rank.
CONS: Cold winters, low walkability.
NOTED: Average tax climate, doctors per capita. Population 60,000. Newcomer to this list.
TRIVIA: Town's name is misspelling of local hero.
Colorado Springs, Colorado
PROS: Promising economic outlook and plentiful jobs in the outdoor playgound bordered by scenic Pike's Peak. Cost of living at the national average, average home price $225,000. Above average air quality. High rank on Milken aging index. Kudos for bicycling environment and atmosphere of volunteering.
CONS: Low walkability, above average home price of $225,000, cold winters.
NOTED: Average tax climate, physicians per capita and serious crime rate. Population 440,000. Last on this list 2011.
TRIVIA: Town once dubbed the "City of Millionaires."
Columbia, Missouri
PROS: Booming economy in classic college town (University of Missouri, Stephens College, Columbia College). Halfway between St. Louis and Kansas City. Cost of living 5% below national norm, average home price $159,000. Abundant doctors per capita, top ranking on Milken aging list. Good bicycle environment.
CONS: Weather subject to extremes, below average air quality, crime rate too high.
NOTED: Average tax climate. Population 115,000. Back on list after skipping a year.
TRIVIA: Mizzou campus sporty statue of cartoon character Beetle Bailey.
Fargo, North Dakota
PROS: Fast-growing town with rocket economy on the north-flowing Red River of the North. Cost of living 2% below national average, typical home price $176,000. High number of doctors per capita, high rank on Milken aging index. High marks for volunteering culture.
CON: Cold winters.
NOTED: Average tax climate, air quality, serious crime rate and walkability rank. Population 114,000. Constant presence on this list.
TRIVIA: No scenes in 1996 Oscar-honored movie Fargo were shot in Fargo.
Great Falls, Montana
PROS: Strong economy and low unemployment on the banks of the Missouri River. Cost of living 2% below national average, average home $172,000, good tax climate. Above average air quality. High number of doctors per capita, high Milken aging rank, low serious crime rate.
CON: Cold winters.
NOTED: Average walkability. Population 60,000. Newcomer to list.
TRIVIA: Name comes from five Missouri River waterfalls in close proximity.
Huntsville, Alabama
PROS: Tennessee River Valley town enjoys sold economy. Cost of living 3% below national norm, average home price $174,000, good tax climate. Sits in top half of Milken aging rankings.
CONS: High crime rate, low walkability rating.
NOTED: Average doctors per capita and air quality. Mild winters, hot summers. Population 186,000. On list in some previous years.
TRIVIA: Original name was Twickenham.
Lexington, Kentucky
PROS: Strong bluegrass economy led by horse industry and colleges (University of Kentucky, Transylvania University). Cost of living 5% less than U.S. average, typical home price $143,000, good tax environment. Moderate climate. Numerous physicians per capita, high Milken aging rank. High marks for walkability and volunteerism.
CONS: None.
NOTED: Average air quality, serious crime rate. Population 308,000. On some previous lists.
TRIVIA: Location--in 1817--of first American performance of a Beethoven symphony.
Culled from Forbes: