Friday, 30 December 2016

My Big Retirement Planning Mistake, and How You Can Avoid It - Megan Elliott


Retirement planning written on a notepad
Retirement planning | iStock.com/designer491
Job hopping is the new normal. The average person will change jobs a dozen times over their career, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sticking with their employer for less than five years on average. Whether those career moves are welcome or forced, they’re almost always disruptive, especially when it comes to retirement planning.
I know from experience. The last time I changed jobs, I made a rookie retirement planning mistake, one I could have easily avoided if I’d taken some initiative. Now, I’m paying the price for my laziness.
If you’re lucky enough to have a 401(k) or similar retirement plan, you may already know that if you leave your job, you have to decide what to do with your savings. You might cash out, roll the money over to an IRA or your new employer’s 401(k), or simply leave it where it is.
I figured rolling my 401(k) over to my existing IRA was the best option. Cashing out meant having to pay penalties and taxes, which I wanted to avoid. The account balance was relatively low, and I couldn’t see any advantage to sticking with the current plan administrator. A rollover meant all my retirement savings would be with the same custodian, which had lower fees and more investment options than my 401(k). But I didn’t do that. Instead, I left my 401(k) where it was.
I’d gone through a rollover in the past, so it wasn’t that I didn’t understand what to do. A phone call and some paperwork would have been enough to set the process in motion and consolidate my retirement savings.
Yet “rollover 401(k)” lingered on my to-do list for months. Why? I hate talking on the phone, for one. I was busy. It didn’t seem that important. Besides, the money seemed to be doing fine right where it was.
But my money wasn’t fine. It turned out my old 401(k) plan administrator didn’t want anything to do with my little retirement account.

Where did my money go?

Confused person holding money
Confused person holding money | iStock.com/Alen-D
I write about personal finance and retirement for a living, and I consider myself fairly money savvy. So, I was pretty shocked when about 18 months after switching jobs, I received a letter from a company I’d never heard of telling me they had the money I’d saved for retirement when I was with my previous employer. I had no idea a third-party could swoop in and scoop up my retirement savings without my OK. But that’s exactly what happened.
Naturally, I was more than a little suspicious. Who were these scam artists, and did they really have my money? But a little research revealed I wasn’t dealing with a scam, at least, not exactly.
The company that had my 401(k) savings was in the business of gobbling up left-behind retirement accounts, taking them off the hands of 401(k) providers who no longer wanted to deal with them. They stepped in, grabbed the money (and collected some fees in the process), and then dumped it into a cash account. The company didn’t even provide an option to invest the funds, which meant the actual value of my savings would steadily shrink because of inflation, while the fees they charged chipped away at my savings even more.
If I wanted to salvage my savings, I needed to do what I should have done in the first place: move the money into my IRA. In theory, that should be a fairly simple transaction. In practice, it’s proving to be quite a hassle. The paperwork is confusing. Special signature verifications are required. I need to fax someone a copy of my driver’s license. And so on.
I can’t really complain too much. All of this could have been avoided if I’d just had my act together and rolled over the money right after I left my last job. Fortunately, the amount involved is relatively small, so this oversight isn’t seriously jeopardizing my future. But my retirement planning mistake has taught me an important lesson about staying on top of your finances.

What you need to do when you change jobs

401(k) statement
401(k) statement | iStock.com/GaryPhoto
If you have money in a 401(k) or other retirement account when you change jobs, you need to make a decision about what to do with those funds. In general, you have three options:
Cash out: In most cases, cashing out your 401(k) is one of the dumbest financial moves you can make. For one, you’ll pay a 10% penalty for an early withdrawal if you’re younger than 59½. And if you have a traditional 401(k), your plan administrator will usually withhold 20% of your balance for taxes. So, if your 401(k) is worth $25,000, you might get a check for $17,500 after taxes and penalties, a loss of $7,500.
Cashing out also leaves you playing catch up with retirement savings. Withdrawing your money means you’ll lose out on future investment growth, which can translate to tens of thousands of dollars less when you retire.
Roll it over: Moving your money from a 401(k) to an IRA when you change jobs is another option. Transferring the funds has several advantages. You’ll usually have more control over your investments and the fees you pay. Customizing your beneficiary designations may also be easier, according to Dan Moisand at Marketwatch.
If you are going to roll over your 401(k), opt for a direct rollover if possible. In this transaction, your 401(k) plan administrator sends the money directly to your IRA custodian. You never touch the funds, avoiding taxes and penalties. In an indirect rollover, the plan administrator sends you a check, which you deposit in your IRA. In that case, taxes may be withheld, and you could get hit with penalties if you don’t complete the transaction within 60 days.
Some people might want to roll over a traditional 401(k) to a Roth IRA to take advantage of tax-free investment growth. You’ll have to pay taxes on the money you convert to a Roth, though. If you’re interested in this option, talk to a financial advisor or tax pro so you understand the pros and cons of a Roth conversion.
Leave your money where it is: Despite my experience, leaving your money in your 401(k) isn’t always a mistake. If you’re holding company stock in your retirement plan, want to shield your money from creditors (in certain states), or know you’ll want to tap your savings early, sticking with your 401(k) may be the best option, according to Bankrate. If you think you want to leave your money where it is, talk to your 401(k) administrator to make sure they don’t require you to cash out or roll over your savings. If your new employer offers a 401(k), you may also be able to transfer your savings to the new plan.

retirement label on jar filled with coins
Retirement savings | iStock.com
Bottom line: If you change jobs and have retirement savings, you need to decide what to do with your money. Each option has pros and cons depending on your particular situation. You also need to consider fees, investment options, and performance when deciding who should manage your money. If you’re not sure what you should do, talk to a financial advisor who can provide personalized guidance.
What you shouldn’t do is make the same retirement planning mistake I did: doing nothing out of sheer inertia. Ignoring the issue is a recipe for disaster, especially if you forget about the account or your plan administrator decides it no longer wants your business, and your savings end up in retirement account limbo.

Culled from wallstreetcheatsheet

Thursday, 29 December 2016

Advertisement Lagos government pays N1.9 billion to 495 retireesWale Williams-Smith

Lagos government pays N1.9 billion to 495 retirees
LASPEC boss Folashade Onanuga
The Director-General, Lagos State Pension Commission (LASPEC), Mrs. Folashade Onanuga, has disclosed that a sum of N1.9billion has been paid into Retirement Savings Account of 495 retirees.
Speaking during the 34th Retirement Benefit Bond Certificate presentation in Lagos last week, she also stated that ‘the state government through the Commission has paid to the named beneficiaries of deceased employees, insurance benefits worth the sum of over N114 million.
She further said the Commission is set to pay another N56.1million death benefit today, bringing the total to approximately N170 million. From mid 2010 till date, a total number of 12,426 retirees have received their retirement benefits.
According to her, the unflinching commitment and support of the state government to the sustenance of the Contributory Pension Scheme is to ensure comfort for our retirees and give them a life of financial empowerment.
She said, “the State Government, you will agree with me has never missed out in the payment of monthly contributions into your Retirement Savings Account. The Lagos State Government has continued to play a leadership role in the implementation of the Contributory Pension Scheme in Nigeria. A lot of investments have been made in terms of ICT infrastructure to create an e-environment to ease Pension Scheme administration.”
On his part, the Commissioner for Establishments, Training and Pensions, Dr Akintola Benson Oke, noted that ‘the state government is very much committed to the regular contribution of the monthly deduction of 7.5 per cent from the salary of every employee and the payment of the employers 7.5 per cent contribution.As at November 2016, the total contribution remitted to the PFAs from April 2007 to date is over N75billion.
“We have in place, a highly automated pension administration system, a crop of efficient, professionally qualified and well-trained staff to attend to the needs of contributors and retirees. The Commission is committed to the standards it has set for itself in the best interest of the workers in Lagos State.”
“The insured death of 320 per cent of the terminal salary of a deceased staff is designed by law to be paid to alleviate the immediate needs of the family members left behind. The estate of a deceased staff is also entitled to receive the balance in the retirement account and accrued rights due, if the employee had joined service before commencement of the Contributory Pension Scheme,” Onanuga added.

Culled from Today

Imo PDP blasts Okorocha over ill-treatment of pensioners-Cassandra Adaze-Obi

Imo PDP blasts Okorocha over ill-treatment of pensioners
Imo Governor Rochas Okorocha
Imo State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, says it is “shocked over the calculated attempt by Governor Rochas Okorocha’s administration to deny Imo pensioners their several months arrears of pension, through a well crafted fraudulent means.”
The position of the PDP was made public via a statement signed by its Publicity Secretary, Mr. Damian Oparah, in Owerri.
“It is heartless for the state government to design a form with the sole intent of misleading the unsuspecting senior citizens into endorsing it. No responsible government will treat its pensioners with such high-level deception, just to rob them of their entitlement, which they toiled for over the years,” Oparah said.
The party equally fumed that apart from asking the retirees to endorse the poisonous document, the administration went further to insert a very dangerous clause that will permanently deny the pensioners their entitlements for life.
“To any discerning mind, this killer clause, if the pensioners sign the document, will deprive them for life of any claim to their entitlement. This, by all standards, is the height of Governor Okorocha’s hatred for Imo pensioners,” the PDP leadership said.
Imo PDP equally said it viewed Okorocha’s well thought out plan to deprive the aged retirees of their pension entitlement as “not only an act of suppression and oppression, but also an evil treatment which our senior citizens do not deserve.”

Culled from Today News

Thursday, 8 December 2016

4 Surprising Things That Could Lower Your Credit Score - Sheiresa Ngo

You do everything you can to keep your credit in tip-top shape. You pay your bills in full and on time, you keep your credit utilization as low as possible, and you make sure you stay on top of all your accounts so that none of them goes into collection. However, if you’re not careful, you could still unknowingly ding your credit score. There are some simple financial transactions you might be making on a regular basis that could be hurting you. Could you be making a credit mistake and not even realize it? Here are four surprising things that could lower your credit score.

1. Not using your credit cards

woman chooses one credit card from many
Woman holding credit cards | iStock.com/BernardaSv
You may reason that keeping your credit cards in a dark place somewhere far away from you is the best way to go. However, unused credit cards can have a negative impact on your credit score. Generally, if you don’t use your credit card for an extended period of time (anywhere from a few months to a few years), your credit card issuer could respond by closing your account due to inactivity.
The absence of that credit card could lower your score by reducing your available credit, which will consequently raise your credit utilization. (This refers to the amount of your available credit you’re using. It makes up 30% of your FICO score.) Once your card is closed, that available credit will no longer be factored into your credit utilization, so your total balances will appear to be a higher percentage of your total limits, according to Experian.

2. Failure to return library books

man at the library
Man at the library | iStock.com
The library is a great place to read some interesting books and sharpen your knowledge. You can rely on your local library to catch up on quiet time and save money on book purchases. But, the library can also become your worst nightmare when it comes to your credit score. If you fail to pay a library fine, some libraries will sic a collections agency on you. If the agency decides to report your unpaid fines to a credit reporting agency, you’ll see your score drop by a few points. One agency used by some libraries is the Library Division of Unique Management Services, which specializes in helping libraries recover overdue fees, fines, and materials. Since 1996, the service has helped libraries recover more than $250 million.
If you think no one ever really gets punished for not returning a library book, think again. Not even the relatives of celebrities are immune. One person who was accused of failing to return a library book got much more than a lowered credit score — she got jail time. The mother of Gossip Girl actress Tika Sumpter, Janice Acquista, was arrested for a $10 late fee. The North Carolina library eventually discovered they hadn’t updated their records and that Acquista had actually paid the fee.


3. Renting a car with a debit card

car salesman
Cars in a lot | Matt Cardy/Getty Images
If you don’t want to pay your rental car deposit with a credit card, some rental agencies will allow you to use your debit card. However, some agencies include a clause in their rental agreement that says they can pull your credit report if you decide to pay with your debit card. Unfortunately, this credit check will result in a hard inquiry. This is when a financial institution requests a credit check in order to decide whether to extend credit to you. Each time a hard inquiry occurs, your score will be negatively impacted. Hard inquiries stay on your credit report up to two years. However, the experts at Equifax say if you’re shopping for a new student, auto, or mortgage loan, it is usually counted as a single inquiry.

4. Co-signing a loan

Loan application form with hourglass
Loan application form with hourglass | iStock.com/TheaDesign
When you co-sign a loan, you are now taking legal responsibility for the account. It will appear on your credit report as one of your financial obligations. Consequently, if the person you co-signed with misses payments or decides not to pay at all, your credit score will take a hit. Also be aware that your total debt burden automatically increases when you add a co-signed loan to the mix. Roughly 30% of your FICO score takes into account the total amounts owed. The more debt you have, the greater risk you are to potential lenders because the additional loan increases your overall credit utilization, making it appear as if you are under greater financial strain. Co-signing on a loan could not only hurt your credit score but also reduce your ability to secure an additional loan at an attractive interest rate.

Culled from wallstreetcheatsheet

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Dallas Mayor Sues to Stop Police, Fire Pension Exits-Heather Gillers


More than $500 million in withdrawals have been made since early August

Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings before a city council budget meeting at Dallas City Hall in August 
Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings before a city council budget meeting at Dallas City Hall in August Photo: Associated Press
The police and firefighters of Dallas have pulled more than $500 million out of their retirement savings plan since early August, worried that their pension fund could soon run out of money. Now, Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings is suing to stop them.
The Dallas mayor said he is acting in his private capacity as a Dallas taxpayer and paying for the suit himself. In a Monday court filing, Mr. Rawlings asks a Dallas County judge for a restraining order that temporarily halts withdrawals from the Dallas Police and Fire Pension Fund.
The revolt by members of the $2.27 billion fund heightens the risk that a major U.S. pension fund could run out of money. It also offers an extreme case of what can happen when a pension wagers on lucrative returns to cover funding shortfalls.
Many pension funds took on more risk in recent years to fill mounting funding gaps, hurt in part by declining bond yields that damped returns. Between 2007 and 2015, the average percentage of assets large pension plans parked in alternative investments or real estate grew to 17.6% from 10.1%, according to the Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service.
But Dallas is in a class by itself. The withdrawals since August represent an 18% drop in the fund’s total assets, seriously reducing the fund’s ability to earn money through investment.
“This particular circumstance is more akin to runs on the bank that you saw at the beginning of the Depression because people were afraid they weren’t going to get their money,” said Robert Klausner, an attorney who represents public pension funds.
The situation is roiling a city still reeling from the shooting deaths of five officers in July during a police brutality protest.
Mr. Rawlings’ court filing described the situation as “a financial crisis” for the fund and said that he is worried about its solvency. The mayor’s office has been adamant that taxpayers shouldn’t have to bail out the faltering retirement plan.
Officers say they are pulling their retirement savings because of concerns about the fund’s finances. A series of aggressive real estate bets from Hawaii to Paris and a conflict over the value of those properties triggered more than $500 million in losses, leaving the fund with enough to pay just 45% of future benefits. Officials are warning the pension could go broke by 2027.
Dallas adopted its more aggressive strategy before the crisis, adding luxury homes and shopping centers in Hawaii, student housing in Texas, and raw land in Idaho and Colorado, records show.
The strategy appeared to be working, with Dallas returns often beating national medians. But that success received scrutiny in 2013 when the Dallas Morning News reported that many properties hadn’t been appraised for years. Instead, certain holdings were valued based on their purchase price and in some cases by also adding development and operating expenses, said Chief Financial Officer Summer Loveland, who joined the fund in November 2013.
Administrator Richard Tettamant, who led the fund beginning in 1992, said that any assessments based on purchase prices were appropriate and that the board approved all investments. He resigned in June 2014 at the board’s request, and remaining officials began re-evaluating the fund’s holdings.
Between 2013 and 2015 the fund lost $545 million due to market losses and write-downs. Trustees gave up on the idea of earning 8.5% returns, lowering their target to 7.25%.
The Dallas pension plan has already been forced to sell off assets and deplete cash levels to accommodate the wave of withdrawals, according to the lawsuit. The mass pullout “is irreparably harming” the Dallas plan’s finances, the lawsuit alleges, threatening its ability to make future pension payments to retirees or pay workers, vendors and creditors.
If the withdrawals continue, “no solution is possible,” according to the lawsuit.
Police and firefighters are able to make lump sum withdrawals from the pension fund by retiring and pulling their money from the Deferred Retirement Option Program where monthly pension checks accumulate interest if police and firefighters chose to work past retirement age.
The public-safety workers are in the midst of voting on a series of benefit cuts that would reduce the amount needed to bail out the pension fund from $3.2 billion to $1.1 billion, according to pension officials. A county court ruled Friday that the vote could go forward after temporarily halting it based on a separate suit filed by five police officers and firefighters.
At a brief court hearing Monday on Mr. Rawlings’ suit, a judge postponed the question of whether to grant an emergency temporary restraining order until after a Thursday pension board meeting, said Laura Reed, a spokeswoman for Mike Rawlings who attended the hearing. That gives the pension board an opportunity to vote to block withdrawals from the fund on its own.
In September, the fund’s board considered restricting withdrawals from the fund but opted against it. Instead, pension officials begged police and firefighters to stop, warning that “our long-term solvency will become much more challenging” if the exit continues.
Even so, trustees heard more than 80 requests to retire in October, compared with a monthly average of 14.
“I have not seen this situation anywhere else in the country,” said Alicia Munnell, the director of Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research. “It’s the combination of bad investment outcomes and an extraordinarily large [withdrawal] program that led to serious trouble.”

Source: Wallstreet

Friday, 2 December 2016

5 of the Worst Jobs for a Relationship- Erika Rawes

People stressed out at their jobs
People stressed out at their jobs | Hulton Archive/Getty Images
“Honey, I’m home,” you say as you walk through the door after a long day at work. What type of reception do you receive from your significant other? Do you get the feeling that your S.O. is thanking his or her lucky stars that you made it home safely? Or is he or she asking you a million questions about where you were all day, what you did, and the details of every single conversation you had?
If you feel as though you’re under investigation each day, as though you’re placing too much worry on your significant other, or if your job causes a lot of arguments, your job and your relationship might not match up so well. Some careers are tougher on relationships than others.
Using data on divorce rates and job stress, we’ve created a list of careers that make the work-love life balance a lot harder. And when we talk about jobs that are tough on a relationship, we’re not only referring to the obvious ones (think exotic dancer); you may not expect some of these careers to throw salt on your relationship game. Check out the jobs on the following pages.

 

1. Casino worker (and other gaming service worker)

hands holding casino chips
Casino worker | Source: iStock
Many casinos are open 24/7/365. Workers at these types of establishments often work irregular hours, and they may even have to work on holidays. In addition to working during odd hours, casino workers may work around alcohol, gambling, and a party-like environment — this can place added strain on a relationship, too.
A 2010 study of Census data published by the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology found that gaming services workers had one of the highest divorce rates relative to other occupations. With a divorce rate of 31.4% (34.7% for gaming cage workers), this is exceptionally high when compared to the roughly 16% of Americans across all occupations who had been divorced or separated at the time of the data collection. And, to top it all off, gaming services workers are only paid a median salary of around $27,000 per year, per BLS estimates.
 

1. Casino worker (and other gaming service worker)

hands holding casino chips
Casino worker | Source: iStock
Many casinos are open 24/7/365. Workers at these types of establishments often work irregular hours, and they may even have to work on holidays. In addition to working during odd hours, casino workers may work around alcohol, gambling, and a party-like environment — this can place added strain on a relationship, too.
A 2010 study of Census data published by the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology found that gaming services workers had one of the highest divorce rates relative to other occupations. With a divorce rate of 31.4% (34.7% for gaming cage workers), this is exceptionally high when compared to the roughly 16% of Americans across all occupations who had been divorced or separated at the time of the data collection. And, to top it all off, gaming services workers are only paid a median salary of around $27,000 per year, per BLS estimates.


2. Massage therapist

massage therapist
Getting a massage | Source: iStock
We all know what it’s like to have that green-eyed monster emerge. In an Oprah.com publication, Helen Fisher describes jealousy as a “sickening combination of possessiveness, suspicion, rage, and humiliation.” It’s not unique to men or women, and even other species (like chimps and bluebirds) are faced with jealousy.
Given that the job of a massage therapist involves physical interaction, we probably don’t even need to explain why this occupation could place a burden on a relationship. “What type of clients did you have today?” and “What exactly did you do all day?” are some routine questions a message therapist may hear from a jealous significant other.
Massage therapists are paid a moderate salary — roughly $40,000 per year — to perform their services. According to the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology study, the divorce rate across this occupation is exceptionally high, at 38.2%.





3. Waiter or bartender

bartender, worst jobs
Being a bartender can be one of the worst jobs for having a relationship | Source: iStock
Bartenders are consistently around people who are consuming alcohol. They are assigned the task of being in the center of it all, as a big part of their job is to improve the customer experience. It requires a certain degree of people skills to bartend, and some people are really great at it.
When you’re in a relationship, however, this job can be a source of problems. Bartenders may not know exactly what time they’ll be home from work — they often have to wait until all of the customers leave the establishment so they can perform their side-work before leaving for the night. The Journal study found that bartenders have the second-highest divorce rates, at 38.4%.
Waiters may face similar challenges to bartenders when it comes t

4. Athlete, entertainer, or dancer

Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift | Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images
Famous marriages, separations, divorces, and remarriages are often in the public eye. And with a 28.5% divorce rate among athletes, performers, entertainers, and related workers, there’s no shortage of juicy gossip in this arena. Maybe it’s the nature of the industry that places a strain on relationships: A large amount of travel, attention, and stress can place a burden on any couple.
Dancers and choreographers are in a similar boat. Rated No. 1 for the occupation that’s most likely to get divorced, dancers and choreographers have a 43.1% divorce rate.
o maintaining a relationship. Odd hours, coupled with a unique work environment, can cause strain on any couple. Plus, waiters and bartenders may face financial issues, as they generally work for tips, which is a notoriously inconsistent form of income.
 

5. High-stress jobs

stress
High-stress job | Source: iStock
The below list contains jobs on Forbes’ list of the most stressful jobs in 2016. Many of these careers involve elements of danger, or they feature long or irregular hours. Highly stressful careers are tough on an individual and on a couple, as well.
  • Police or detective
  • Military service member
  • Firefighter
  • Pilot
  • Event coordinator
  • Senior corporate executive
  • Public relations executive
  • Newspaper reporter
  • Broadcaster
  • Taxi driver
Culled from Money & Career Cheat Sheet:

Legal technicalities must not hamper pension scheme—Acting CJN On December 1, 20165:33 pmIn NewsComments The Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, says legal technicalities and attitudes of employers and other stakeholders must not hamper the objectives of the pension scheme in Nigeria. Onnoghen, who spoke at a sensitisation workshop on the contributory pension scheme, identified the other stakeholders as Pension Fund Administrators and Pension Custodians. ADVERTISING inRead invented by Teads ADVERTISING inRead invented by Teads The workshop was organised by National Pension Commission (PENCOM) for judges and senior judicial officers in Abuja. “My lords, regulators and officers, I must caution that technicalities by lawyers, attitudes of certain employers, pension administrators and pension custodians must not hamper the good objectives of the Federal Government. “As I held in Central Bank of Nigeria Verses Amao and Ors involving a similar scenario, it is disturbing because the people involved are senior citizens of this country who have contributed their quotas to the development of the nation during their prime.’’ Chief Justice of the Federation, Justice Walter Onnoghen taking the oath of office before the President at the State House, Abuja. Photo by Abayomi ADESHIDA 10/11/2016 He decried the attitude of the bank toward its pensioners, adding that it appeared not to see the injustice or inequality the government sought to redress through the contributory scheme. “Appellant contends even in the face of statutory and constitutional provisions that the Central Bank of Nigeria is not part of the Federal Public Service for the purposes of pension and other retirement benefits,’’ he said. Onnoghen advised that organisations in Nigeria should wear a human face in the treatment of senior citizens because it could be anybody’s turn to be one in the future. “We must re-examine our attitude towards the senior citizens of this country so as not to make them regret their sacrifice for the nation in whatever capacity,’’ he said. Onnoghen said that pension fund governance must be aligned with good corporate governance recognised as an important part and parcel of efficient pension system. He said everybody owed this generation and generations yet unborn to ensure that pensioners who devoted their lives and strengths to serve Nigeria received their pension benefits promptly. Onnoghen noted that in order to consolidate this consciousness, everybody must support the Federal Government’s fight against corruption. He said this called for objectivity and impartiality by regulatory officials, accountability by pension administrators and transparency by pension fund custodians and other stakeholders. Earlier, PENCOM Director-General, Mrs Chinelo Anohu-Amazu, said previous workshops conducted in 2013 by the agency for judges was remarkable in the Nigerian pension reform implementation. She, however, said there had been challenges in the implementation because of the lack of adequate understanding of the responsibilities by stakeholders. The director-general said some challenges also arose in the course of enforcing compliance on recalcitrant employers by the commission which ultimately were resolved in the courts. Earlier, Mrs Roseline Bozimo, Administrator, National Judicial Institute, said the workshop was organised in realisation of the main objectives of the institute’s law. She said this was the first workshop that had involved judges on the contributory pension scheme, laws, practices and ethics since the promulgation of the Pension Reform Act 2014. Bozimo said that the National Judicial Institute was partnering PENCOM to ensure that there was an effective development of the nation’s pension laws. She explained that the workshop would enhance and equip the judges in their skills for pension adjudication. You May Like Why I did not mention Tinubu in my victory speech, by Akeredolu - Vanguard News How has Obasanjo betrayed Buhari? - Vanguard News Tony Umez gets shocker after flaunting daughter - Vanguard News Murder: Two siblings, traditional ruler's sons to die by hanging - Vanguard News Toke Makinwa spills the bean, says Maje infected her with STI - Vanguard News Operation Python Dance, another dimension of war against Ndigbo — MASSOB - Vanguard News by Taboola Okogba View all posts by Okogba → Previous Post AYEEN Video: Mock President Buhari says Nigeria is not in recession#AYEEN Next Post House of Representatives Reps to give Chief Justice of Nigeria power to appoint tribunals’ chairmen, members You might also like Why I did not mention Tinubu in my victory speech, by Akeredolu Why I did not mention Tinubu in my victory speech, by Akeredolu When Owerri bowed to pro-Biafra activists When Owerri bowed to pro-Biafra activists My mum is having sex with her boss My mum is having sex with her boss Super-rich Nigerian celebs who are living large Super-rich Nigerian celebs who are living large Day my boobs embarrassed me - Sarraphina Day my boobs embarrassed me - Sarraphina Breakingnews: About 50 heavily armed soldiers deployed to Wike's residence Breakingnews: About 50 heavily armed soldiers deployed to Wike's residence NDA Cadet, ‘brutalised’ to death a day after arrival NDA Cadet, ‘brutalised’ to death a day after arrival Why I asked for a divorce from my ex-husband Why I asked for a divorce from my ex-husband Recommended by Disclaimer Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof. 1 comment Livefyre Sign in 1 person listening nigeriacustomrice2016 Newest | Oldest nigeriacustomrice2016 nigeriacustomrice2016 14 hours ago C,TION OF_()lMPOUNDED RICE FOR S4LE AT L0W P,RlCES. #6,500, AND GROUNDNUT OIL FOR #5,000 CALL THE MARKETING DEPARTMENT Reach us on 090634931-70. Royal crown=N6,5OO, Ade Brazil=N6,5OO, Elephant Gold=N6,5OO, Super eagle=N6,5OO, CAp-rice=6,500"" FlagShare LikeReply

Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/12/legal-technicalities-must-not-hamper-pension-scheme-acting-cjn/